Skip to Main Content

Sustainable and Impact Investing 2020: Insights and Perspectives

Cambridge Associates

Overview

  • Of the 202 Cambridge Associates clients that responded to the 2020 survey, 100 reported engaging in sustainable and impact investing (50%) and an additional 23 reported engaging in ESG integration and/or impact investing, though they answered “no” to the SII engagement question, bringing the total to 123 (61%) reporting engaging in sustainable and impact investing and ESG—a significant increase (25%) relative to our 2018 survey results.
  • Over the last two years, implementation of sustainable and impact investing increased by 2.5 times in the UK and Europe, surpassing US engagement, which also rose by 22%.
  • Institutions that do not engage in sustainable and impact investing mainly cited that their mission is solely addressed via programmatic/philanthropic activities. However, over a third of these institutions anticipate engaging in SII in the future, most within two years.

Investment Structure

  • The ways in which responding institutions incorporate sustainable and impact investing most often include: developing an Investment Policy Statement (IPS) that integrates SII priorities, principles, and decision criteria; engaging with advisor to implement; and informing their investment managers that SII/ESG is important.
  • Half of the institutions implementing SII strategies have less than 5% of their long-term investment pool allocated to sustainable and impact investing. Over the past five years, 75% of the respondents reported they increased their allocation to sustainable and impact investing. And importantly, over 80% of respondents reported plans to increase their allocation to sustainable and impact investing over the next five years.

Implementation Strategies

  • Institutions continue to employ a range of strategies to achieve SII objectives, including ESG integration, impact investing, negative screening, and program-related investments. ESG implementation rose significantly over the last two years, as did impact investing, in a shift away from negative screening as a commonly selected strategy.
  • Climate change and resource efficiency is the most common thematic focus area, followed by social equity and inclusion.
  • More than a third of institutions engaging in sustainable and impact investing consider racial and/or gender equity in investment decision-making. An additional third anticipate considering these factors in the future.

Madeline Clark, Associate Investment Director

 

Last Updated:

This website is directed and intended to be accessed by persons who satisfy any of the following criteria:

  1. A professional client or an eligible counterparty*
  2. A financial advisor or financial intermediary acting on behalf of a professional client or eligible counterparty*
  3. An employee or prospective employee

If you satisfy any of these criteria, please click confirm to proceed:

Please check this box to remember my choice

*As defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Directive 2014/65/EC) as amended or updated (MiFID)

This website is directed and intended to be accessed by persons who satisfy any of the following criteria:

  1. A regulated financial entity*
  2. An institutional investor, investment professional and other entities or individuals who are qualified to operate in financial markets involving regulated financial activity as defined by its local country regulator
  3. An employee or prospective employee

If you satisfy any of these criteria, please click confirm to proceed:

Please check this box to remember my choice

*An entity regulated by its local country regulator which may include banks, collective investment schemes, endowments, foundations, investment managers, insurance companies, pension funds and intermediaries

The information contained herein is not suitable for retail investors.

Please contact us if you have any questions: ContactCA@cambridgeassociates.com

If you clicked decline in error, please click here