• News & Events
  • Managers
  • Careers
  • Submit RFP
  • Contact
  • Client/Manager Login
  • Search
  • Services
    • Outsourced CIO
    • Non-Discretionary Management
    • Staff Extension
    • Asset Class Mandates
  • Asset Classes
    • Co-Investments
    • Hedge Funds
    • Sustainable and Impact Investing
    • Private Credit
    • Private Equity
    • Public Investments
    • Real Assets
    • Venture Capital
  • Clients
    • Endowments & Foundations
    • Healthcare Systems
    • Pensions
    • Private Clients
    • Governments & Insurance
  • Insights
    • Research Publications
    • CA Answers
    • Private Investment Benchmarks
    • CA Institute
    • COVID-19 Resources
  • About Us
    • Leadership
    • History
    • Investment Philosophy
    • Locations
    • Firm Values
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Services
    • Home Page
    • Services
    • Outsourced CIO
    • Non-Discretionary Management
    • Staff Extension
    • Asset Class Mandates
  • Asset Classes
    • Home Page
    • Asset Classes
    • Co-Investments
    • Hedge Funds
    • Sustainable and Impact Investing
    • Private Credit
    • Private Equity
    • Public Investments
    • Real Assets
    • Venture Capital
  • Clients
    • Home
    • Clients
    • Endowments & Foundations
    • Healthcare Systems
    • Pensions
    • Private Clients
    • Governments & Insurance
  • Insights
    • Home
    • Insights
    • Research Publications
    • CA Answers
    • Private Investment Benchmarks
      • Home
      • Private Investment Benchmarks
      • About Our Benchmarks
      • Commentaries
      • FAQ
    • CA Institute
  • About Us
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Leadership
    • History
    • Investment Philosophy
    • Locations
      • Home
      • Locations
      • Arlington, VA
      • Beijing, China
      • Boston, MA
      • Dallas, TX
      • London, UK
      • Menlo Park, CA
      • Munich, Germany
      • New York, NY
      • San Francisco, CA
      • Singapore
      • Sydney, Australia
    • Firm Values
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • News & Events
    • Home
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
  • Managers
    • Home Page
    • Managers
    • Criteria & Screening Process
    • Join Now
  • Careers
    • Home Page
    • Careers
    • Our Groups
      • Our Groups
      • Global Investing
      • Portfolio Services
      • Shared Services
    • Our Culture
    • Early Career
    • Experienced Professional
    • FMLA Employee Rights & Responsibilities
  • Submit RFP
  • Contact
  • CLIENT/MANAGER LOGIN
  • Research Publications
  • CA Answers
  • Private Investment Benchmarks
  • CA Institute
Twitter
Linkedin
Email
Sharethis
November 2017

Harvesting the Potential of Private Investments

In the November 2017 issue of Benefits Magazine, which covers benefit issues affecting multiemployer, single employer and public plan representatives, senior investment director and investment actuary in Cambridge Associates’ pension practice, Alex Pekker, contributed an article highlighting the potential for private investments in a pension’s investment portfolio.

Pekker explains that private investments could be a key driver of improved return for many plans, and could be particularly important in the years ahead given projected low returns for most traditional asset classes over the next decade. Key takeaways from the article include:

  • For a host of reasons, returns for domestic and international equity, and for U.S. government and corporate bonds are expected to be challenged in years ahead, with as low as a 4% ten-year compound return projected for a 60/40 simple portfolio;
  • Private investments, both private equity and private credit, have historically outperformed their public counterparts by considerable margins and thus could play a pivotal role in helping plans become more solvent and fund benefits for current and future retirees;
  • Private investment strategies are both opaque and diverse, representing a varied range of objectives and attributes;
  • Many plan sponsors are under-allocating to private investments and may be giving up on critical return potential due to overestimating their plans’ liquidity constraints;
  • Private investment returns vary widely; the difference between top and bottom quartile managers is 4 to 5 times higher than for public market equivalents. Thus, manager selection and monitoring is essential; and
  • In implementing a private investment strategy, customization to plan objectives and characteristics is fundamental to program success.

Click here to view the full article in PDF format.

Twitter
Linkedin
Email
Sharethis

Download Report

Related Links
Hedge Funds Versus Alternative Risk Premia

Pension Series

Friend or Foe: Hedge Funds Versus Alternative Risk Premia (Euro Edition)

Recent years have seen challenges for hedge funds and a shift toward low-fee passive and alternative risk premia (ARP) products in investor portfolios. In this paper, we investigate whether ARP and hedge funds are complementary or whether ARP funds are actually a viable replacement for hedge funds.
Read More »

Liability-Hedging Strategies, Cambridge Associates

Pension Series

Liability-Hedging Strategies for US Plan Sponsors in the Low Interest Rate Era

While many plan sponsors have adapted to dramatic interest rate swings by strategically hedging their liability interest rate risk, some balk when interest rates are low. But failing to hedge long-duration liabilities with long-duration assets can expose sponsors to significant downside risk.
Read More »

Find
Our global office locations
Subscribe
Our insights and news by email
Follow
Our insights and news on LinkedIn
Contact
Get in touch with us
Copyright © 2021 Cambridge Associates LLC. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms and Conditions