• News & Events
  • Managers
  • Careers
  • Submit RFP
  • Contact
  • Client/Manager Login
  • Search
  • Services
    • Outsourced CIO
    • Non-Discretionary Management
    • Staff Extension
    • Asset Class Mandates
  • Asset Classes
    • Co-Investments
    • Hedge Funds
    • Sustainable and Impact Investing
    • Private Credit
    • Private Equity
    • Public Investments
    • Real Assets
    • Venture Capital
  • Clients
    • Endowments & Foundations
    • Healthcare Systems
    • Pensions
    • Private Clients
    • Governments & Insurance
  • Insights
    • Research Publications
    • CA Answers
    • Private Investment Benchmarks
    • CA Institute
    • COVID-19 Resources
  • About Us
    • Leadership
    • History
    • Investment Philosophy
    • Locations
    • Firm Values
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Services
    • Home Page
    • Services
    • Outsourced CIO
    • Non-Discretionary Management
    • Staff Extension
    • Asset Class Mandates
  • Asset Classes
    • Home Page
    • Asset Classes
    • Co-Investments
    • Hedge Funds
    • Sustainable and Impact Investing
    • Private Credit
    • Private Equity
    • Public Investments
    • Real Assets
    • Venture Capital
  • Clients
    • Home
    • Clients
    • Endowments & Foundations
    • Healthcare Systems
    • Pensions
    • Private Clients
    • Governments & Insurance
  • Insights
    • Home
    • Insights
    • Research Publications
    • CA Answers
    • Private Investment Benchmarks
      • Home
      • Private Investment Benchmarks
      • About Our Benchmarks
      • Commentaries
      • FAQ
    • CA Institute
  • About Us
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Leadership
    • History
    • Investment Philosophy
    • Locations
      • Home
      • Locations
      • Arlington, VA
      • Beijing, China
      • Boston, MA
      • Dallas, TX
      • London, UK
      • Menlo Park, CA
      • Munich, Germany
      • New York, NY
      • San Francisco, CA
      • Singapore
      • Sydney, Australia
    • Firm Values
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • News & Events
    • Home
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
  • Managers
    • Home Page
    • Managers
    • Criteria & Screening Process
    • Join Now
  • Careers
    • Home Page
    • Careers
    • Our Groups
      • Our Groups
      • Global Investing
      • Portfolio Services
      • Shared Services
    • Our Culture
    • Early Career
    • Experienced Professional
    • FMLA Employee Rights & Responsibilities
  • Submit RFP
  • Contact
  • CLIENT/MANAGER LOGIN
  • Research Publications
  • CA Answers
  • Private Investment Benchmarks
  • CA Institute
Twitter
Linkedin
Email
Sharethis
March 2019

With Brexit Stress Peaking, Should Investors Tactically Increase Exposure to UK Equities?

Michael Salerno
Michael Salerno

Answers to our clients’ questions about market action and the market environment in a few paragraphs every two weeks.

No, we don’t believe the politics of Brexit are conducive to tactical asset allocation. Whenever Brexit happens, and irrespective of the form, protracted uncertainty is likely. While we continue to believe that investors should modestly overweight global ex US stocks—including the globally oriented UK equity market—relative to US equivalents, our call is unrelated to Brexit and instead rests largely on our conviction that historically stretched relative valuations should partially mean revert over time. UK equities in aggregate are fairly insulated from Brexit dynamics, but the market’s valuations and fundamentals are a mixed bag and do not support a tactical tilt vis-à-vis other non-US markets.

Regardless of near-term developments, the ultimate Brexit end-state may not be known for several years to come, given both (1) the herculean task of unwinding years of economic and political convergence and developing a new relationship with the EU, and (2) the current lack of consensus within the UK government regarding what the future relationship should entail. To quote a member of UK Parliament, who recently likened Brexit to the Welsh devolution, “Brexit is a process, not an event.” This is particularly apt in light of the UK government’s current plan to make a mostly clean break from the EU’s customs union and single market and to attempt to negotiate a comprehensive free trade agreement, which could be years in the making. Investors should therefore maintain a long-term perspective and ignore the short-term Brexit noise.

Since the June 2016 referendum, the trade-weighted pound sterling appears to have moved to a structurally lower trading range in anticipation of greater trade friction between the United Kingdom and the EU. The pound’s valuation remains below its historical average, primarily driven by its exchange rate with the pricey US dollar. Sterling arguably has priced in much of the potential impact of the “hard, but orderly and prolonged” Brexit deal that’s been negotiated. Though sterling could experience some moderate appreciation whenever “Brexit day” is confirmed, 1 it’s difficult to see the GBP returning to pre-referendum levels on a sustained basis unless Brexit is ultimately cancelled.

Although exposed to Brexit developments through their sterling denomination, UK equities in aggregate have a globally oriented revenue stream that helps insulate them fundamentally. The UK market derives less than one-third of revenues domestically and more than one-half of UK sales are generated outside Europe. Yet, the market’s sector exposure is less desirable. The UK market is heavily tilted to industries facing disruption—together financials, energy, and basic consumer goods compose roughly half of the market. Also, exposure to the companies doing the disrupting is limited, given the UK market’s miniscule exposure to technology, including internet software and services. Sell-side analysts estimate that long-term earnings per share (EPS) growth will be roughly half the US market’s expected EPS growth rate.

UK equities appear somewhat undervalued on the surface, and the UK market’s dividend yield is among the highest on offer globally. Yet, while the overhang of Brexit uncertainty has been a factor, today’s below average valuations for the UK equity market as a whole also reflect the relatively unattractive industry mix and an above-average exposure to idiosyncratic company risks. Additionally, the UK market also appears much cheaper than broader developed markets on a relative basis, but this is primarily due to the high valuations of US stocks and is not unique to UK equities.

For further discussion on this topic, please see Michael Salerno et al., “Brexit’s Crescendo and UK Investors: Tuning Out the Noise,” Cambridge Associates Research Note, March 2019.

The fundamental outlook for the largely internationally oriented UK equity market does not depend on the ultimate outcome of the Brexit process and its future implications for the domestic economy. Still, undemanding UK equity valuations reflect more than just Brexit uncertainty and UK equities are not cheap enough in absolute terms to justify an overweight relative to other non-US markets. With UK stocks’ lower beta attributes, they could lag global peers in a scenario where external growth and bond yields surprised on the upside. Similarly, any UK outperformance in anticipation of a softer Brexit scenario could be fleeting as the likely GBP rally associated with such an outcome would weigh on the market’s largely foreign-sourced revenues.


Michael Salerno, Senior Investment Director

Notes:

  1. As this article goes to press, the official UK withdrawal from the EU has been tentatively postponed from March 29, 2019, to April 12, 2019, and could be further delayed. ↩
Twitter
Linkedin
Email
Sharethis
Related Links

CA Answers

In Light of Ongoing “Brexit” Uncertainty, Should Investors Reduce Exposure to UK Equities?

No, investors should consider staying the course. Though developments and headlines associated with the United Kingdom’s Article 50 negotiations with the European Union have been and likely will remain fitful, they reflect more the political nature of the process and less the underlying fundamentals of the economy and its listed equities.
Read More »

CA Answers

Should Investors Reposition their Portfolios in Response to Recent Tariffs and the Rising Threat of Trade Wars?

Not necessarily. Although we believe the announced tariffs are a negative for the global economy, recent market moves have probably more than baked in the pain they will cause.
Read More »

Find
Our global office locations
Subscribe
Our insights and news by email
Follow
Our insights and news on LinkedIn
Contact
Get in touch with us
Copyright © 2021 Cambridge Associates LLC. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms and Conditions